THE ECONOMICS OF DOING NOTHING: A STUDY OF DYNAMIC BENEFITS IN THE SCOPE OF RELATIVE COGNITIVE INERTIA
PDF

Keywords

cognitive inertia
savings pond
stagnant spending
fiscal trends
trade freeze
passive habits
subconscious factors
behavioural patterns
static friction

How to Cite

C, V. (2024). THE ECONOMICS OF DOING NOTHING: A STUDY OF DYNAMIC BENEFITS IN THE SCOPE OF RELATIVE COGNITIVE INERTIA. Global Health Synapse, 1(1), 1-8. https://www.globalhealthsynapse.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1

Abstract

This module explores the impact of "doing nothing" within the field of economics, focusing on the overlooked concept of inertia in both microeconomic and macroeconomic contexts. By examining key concepts such as "trade freeze," "fiscal trends," "savings pond," and "stagnant spending," this paper provides a marginalized perspective on passive economic strategies in relation to conventional active approaches. This approach emphasizes cognitive inertia inverse to behavioral inertia. Utilizing secondary data, the analysis reveals the complexities and benefits associated with cognitive inertia, highlighting its potential advantages and the beneficiaries it affects. The study not only addresses the physical dynamics of the economy but also delves into the behavioral habits linked to inertia, offering insights into its role in contemporary unproductive economic practices.

PDF

References

Murphy, J. (1963). The power of your subconscious mind. Prentice-Hall.

Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behaviour: A neuropsychological theory. Wiley.

Mattila, A. S. (2020). Impact of cognitive inertia on postconsumption evaluation processes. Retrieved from

ResearchGate

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Morisna, A., Lubis, R. A., & Sulaiman. (2017). The influence of brand experience on brand loyalty

mediated by brand trust and satisfaction (Empirical study on brands of Body Shop in Banda Aceh,

Indonesia). Retrieved from EAS publisher.

Sharma, P. (2021). Psychological factors in determining consumer experience. Retrieved from

inspirajournals.

McKibbin, W., & Fernando, R. (2020). The global economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Retrieved from White Rose Research Online.

Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and

Organization, 1(1), 39-60. Retrieved from ResearchGate.

Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2007). Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behavior. Journal of

Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 81-104. Retrieved from ReasearchGate.

Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform

economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9-64. Retrieved from ResearchGate.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Vincy C (Author)